Today the Ontario government announced “Ontario Endorses Expert Report on Home and Community Care” as it released Bringing Care Home, a report from the expert group on home and community care led by Dr. Gail Donner. The release stated, “This report will help inform the next steps in Ontario’s home care strategy which will be announced in the coming months.” The report presents what the expert group heard from stakeholders, and the experts’ response to what they heard – leading to 16 recommendations plus enablers required for their implementation. Key points for AFHTO members are the report’s calls for:
- Clear, consistent definition of the “basket of services” and eligibility to receive them
- Improved communication between home and community and primary care
- Role of LHINs in both home and community care and primary care
- Performance measurement, management and results-based funding, for both home and community care and primary care
- Human resource planning, including strategies to address the wage gap between sectors
These themes appear to be aligned with points recently reported from ministry meetings in recent emails to AFHTO members – MOHLTC’s priorities and plans for primary care and What’s ahead for FHTs + NPLCs . AFHTO members will be pleased to see the report acknowledges the key role of primary care. Some excerpts:
- The delivery of primary care should be better aligned with home and community care. Communication between primary care providers and service providers is poor (e.g., discharge summaries not sent or sent too late to be useful, communication between physicians and care coordinators is poor). Primary care providers are not always consulted in the development of home and community care plans, nor are they provided with provider assessments, care plans and reports.
- One of the greatest opportunities to improve home and community care is to improve primary care so it is better equipped to serve its required role as a strong foundation for the rest of the health system.
- Having an involved primary care provider is critical to the success of any home care plan.
HIGHLIGHTS FROM REPORT RECOMMENDATIONS
Clear, consistent definition of the “basket of services” and eligibility
Recommendation 3 calls for the ministry to explicitly define which home care and community services are eligible for provincial funding, under what circumstances, determined using a common standardized assessment tool. Not only will this help patients and families, primary care providers would benefit from clear, consistent understanding of available support.
Improved communication between home and community and primary care
Recommendation 1 calls for a Home and Community Care Charter (found on p.18 of report) to be endorsed by the ministry and the principles incorporated into the development of all relevant policies, regulations funding and accountability strategies for this sector. The 11 statements in the charter include: 2. A single care coordinator will work with the client and family to identify their needs and the most appropriate services to meet those needs. 3. The care coordinator and primary care providers will communicate regularly and in a timely fashion. Where appropriate, technology will be used to facilitate timely and ongoing communication among members of the circle of care.
Role of LHINs in both home and community care and primary care
The report points to a number of current challenges. Some excerpts:
- Home and community care is funded through the LHINs, whereas most primary care practitioners are funded directly by the MOHLTC. Many of the strategies and services needed for more integrated care may already be part of the service agreements between primary care providers and the MOHLTC, and integration could be improved by assigning responsibility for managing those agreements to the LHINs.
- Primary care was not explicitly in the Expert Group’s mandate; however, the engagement of primary care is a critical success factor for home and community care reform and many stakeholders, both families and providers, identified it as an issue of concern. Unless primary care and home and community care are well aligned, the needed transformation will not be possible. A critical enabler for this alignment is to manage the delivery of primary care through the same entity that manages other elements of home and community care: the LHINs.
Recommendations 8 and 9 (see next section below) call for a direct role for LHINs with primary care. To the extent that FHTs and NPLCs could be interested in becoming “lead agencies”, recommendation 11 is also of interest. Recommendation 8: That Local Health Integration Networks, in collaboration with the LHINs’ Primary Care Leads, develop and implement strategies to improve two-way communication between primary care providers and home and community care providers. Recommendation 11: That the Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care direct the Local Health Integration Networks to select and fund the most appropriate lead agency or agencies to design and coordinate the delivery of outcomes-based home and community care for populations requiring home and community care for a long term within their LHIN. (See p.28 of report for minimum requirements for the lead agency.)
Performance measurement, management and results-based funding
The report identifies several prerequisites for the successful implementation of its recommendations. One of these states, “Until all primary care providers are held accountable for the terms of their services agreement, primary care will not be fully and successfully aligned with home and community care.” Recommendation 9 states that, where performance agreements with primary care providers exist (e.g. with Family Health Teams and Community Health Centres), the Local Health Integration Networks take responsibility for managing performance against the service standards in these agreements and making these results publicly available. Following this recommendation, the report goes on to state:
Although many family health teams have service agreements with the MOHLTC, most of the performance standards are currently related primarily to volume of services. The Primary Care Performance Measurement Steering Committee at Health Quality Ontario is working on system-level indicators and practice-level indicators that will be publicly reported. These indicators should be incorporated into all relevant performance agreements. The Committee’s work will enhance the LHINs’ ability to monitor performance of some primary care providers in their region.
AFHTO’s work with members on the QIDS program and Data to Decisions (D2D) initiative, is giving leadership to advance primary care measurement in a manageable and meaningful way. Recommendation 15 goes further to propose that the Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care tie funding for home and community care services (e.g. home care, community support services, primary care) to the achievement of clearly defined outcomes and results.
Human resource planning and wage gaps between sectors
AFHTO and its collaborators have been strongly promoting solutions to the problems in recruitment and retention in primary care. We are pleased to see the Expert Group also identified this among the prerequisites for the successful implementation: A human resource plan is needed to address shortages of health human resources. Such a plan should address the lack of care providers in rural and remote communities and include strategies for closing the gap in wages across the province and between sectors and working towards sustainable full-time employment for workers in this sector. As more and more primary care providers do home visits, the following prerequisite is also welcome:
- Every worker is entitled to a safe environment. When the work place is the client’s home, it is more difficult to ensure a safe environment for both the client and the care provider. Strategies and policies are needed to provide a safe workplace for home and community care providers.
Implementing the recommendations
The final recommendation calls for the Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care appoint Home and Community Care Implementation Co-Leads (one Co-Lead from within and one from outside of the Ministry), with appropriate support, to guide and monitor the implementation of the recommendations in this report, reporting annually to the Minister of Health and Long-Term Care.