The biggest news coming out of D2D 3.0 is the concrete data that higher quality comprehensive, patient-centered care is related to lower healthcare costs.
Data to Decisions (D2D) is making an impact well beyond what it means to individual teams.
In addition to showing teams how they compare to their peers, D2D is making it easier for AFHTO to advocate for how team-based primary care could be measured across the province. With all the data submitted by members, we can show that measuring in a way that is meaningful and manageable for front-line providers makes a difference.
What difference does this make to your team?
Perhaps you and your team will be encouraged to hear the good news that high quality care is related to lower health system costs. The work you put into quality improvement does make a difference. You may also be encouraged by the early evidence from D2D (consistent with other published literature[1] ) that AFHTO members deliver better quality than the rest of the province on average. The comparison is not totally valid (because of differences in data sources and patient demographics) but it IS a comparison that many are interested in making. AFHTO is using D2D data to support arguments for a provincial solution for consistent capture of patient experience data as well as easier, more timely access to other important data sources. Finally, you and your team may also be encouraged that AFHTO now has an even more compelling argument for aligning performance in primary care with what really matters to patients and primary care teams. In the meantime, you may find the quality roll-up indicator useful at the local level (select the “Roll-up” tab at the top of the display). We have put together some tips for using your results to focus improvement efforts. And if you’d like to spread the good news around, consider sharing this handout with your colleagues. [1] Kiran, T., Victor, J., Kopp, A., Shah, B., & Glazier, R. 2014. The Relationship between Primary Care Models and Processes of Diabetes Care in Ontario. Canadian Journal Of Diabetes, 38(3), 172-178.




