Author: sitesuper

  • F3 Daily Team Huddles in Family Practice: A Strategy for Creating High-Performing Collaborative Care Teams

    Theme 3. Strengthening collaboration within the interprofessional team

     

    Presentation Details

    • Date: 10/18/2016
    • Concurrent Session F
    • Time: 11:45am – 12:30pm
    • Room: Harbour B
    • Style: Presentation (information provided to audience, with opportunity for audience to ask question)
    • Focus: Practical (e.g. Presentation on how to implement programs and/or practices in the team environment)
    • Target Audience: Leadership (ED, clinical lead, board chair, board member, etc.), Clinical providers

    Learning Objectives

    1. Be able to describe the components of an effective daily micro-meeting (huddle) in a clinical team
    2. Understand the impact of such a strategy on one FHT practice
    3. Identify strategies for effective implementation, buy-in, and sustained engagement of daily team huddles

    Summary/Abstract

    A qualitative descriptive design was used to analyze participant perspectives around the influences of the team huddle on the quality of collaboration. Results confirm that daily team huddle improved awareness and knowledge sharing on the team and created an environment of teaching and learning. Huddle led to quality improvements on the team in both improved patient care communication and improved clinic processes. Results indicate improvement in areas including a positive work environment, integration and understanding of roles, team member engagement, communication, collaboration and accountability. Final results will be presented.

    Presenters

    • Katharine De Caire, MN, RN (EC), Clinical Director, McMaster Family Health Team

    Authors & Contributors

    • Ainsley Moore MD, CCFP, MSc
    • Allyn Walsh MD, CCFP, FCFP
    • Jennifer Everson BScN, MD, CCFP, FCFP
  • F2 Rapid Assessment: Optimizing Valuable Professional Clinic Time

    Theme 2. Optimizing access to interprofessional teams

     

    Presentation Details

    • Date: 10/18/2016
    • Concurrent Session F
    • Time: 11:45am – 12:30pm
    • Room: Harbour A
    • Style: Presentation (information provided to audience, with opportunity for audience to ask question)
    • Focus: Practical (e.g. Presentation on how to implement programs and/or practices in the team environment)
    • Target Audience: Leadership (ED, clinical lead, board chair, board member, etc.), Clinical providers

    Learning Objectives

    This session will provide attendees the valuable lessons learned throughout the course of implementing a rapid assessment model of care for patients referred to Social Work services. Participants will also learn the outcomes of implementing a model similar to the rapid assessment not only for mental health services, but all services provided for patients and learn how to reduce long wait-times.

    Summary/Abstract

    The Rapid Assessment Model was implemented due to the increasing wait time for initial assessments for patients newly referred to the Social Worker. Wait-times have decreased from upwards of 4 weeks to an average of 12 business days for an initial appointment through the rapid assessment model. Not only has the rapid assessment model decreased wait times, it is also helping with a reduction in case load for the professional, with only 60% of patients continuing with counselling after the rapid assessment model. 40% of patients are referred to programs, community services, or EAP, or providing with resources and their cases closed.

    Presenters

    • Cheryl Hines, BSW RSW, Social Worker, Thames Valley Family Health Team
    • Natalie Clark, BHSc, Program Administrator, Thames Valley Family Health Team

    Authors & Contributors

    • Cheryl Hines, BSW RSW Social Worker, Thames Valley Family Health Team
    • Natalie Clark, BSW RSW Social Worker, Thames Valley Family Health Team
  • F1 Understanding Health Inequities and Access to Primary Care in the South West LHIN

    Theme 1. Planning programs and fostering partnerships for healthier communities

     

    Presentation Details

    • Date: 10/18/2016
    • Concurrent Session F
    • Time: 11:45am – 12:30pm
    • Room: Pier 4
    • Style: Presentation (information provided to audience, with opportunity for audience to ask question)
    • Focus: Research/Policy (e.g. Presentation of research findings, analysis of policy issues and options)
    • Target Audience: Leadership (ED, clinical lead, board chair, board member, etc.), Representatives of stakeholder/partner organizations

    Learning Objectives

    Participants will gain knowledge on the importance of population-based planning and an understanding of how to ensure that equity is incorporated into this planning. This will be discussed in the context of an equity-based population planning project that was just undertaken in the SW LHIN. Methods, results and actionable outcomes/strategies will be reviewed.

    Summary/Abstract

    Characteristics of vulnerable populations will be discussed  and clinical factors (physical and mental health) will be described. Geographical access based on various factors will be reviewed. Important gaps were mainly found in the rural areas of the SW LHIN. These gaps/risk factors included lower access to primary care providers, less access to team-based care and increased risk of primary care physicians retiring. People living in the lowest income quintile in the SW LHIN were often in the areas with the lowest accessibility to primary care providers.

    Presenters

    • Jennifer Rayner, Research and Evaluation Lead, Association of Ontario Health Centres
    • Andy Kroeker, Executive Director, West Elgin CHC
  • E7 A Patient’s Journey Through Homelessness and Healthcare

    Theme 7. Clinical innovations to address equity

     

    Presentation Details

    • Date: 10/18/2016
    • Concurrent Session E
    • Time: 10:45am – 11:30am
    • Room: Pier 5
    • Style: Presentation (information provided to audience, with opportunity for audience to ask question)
    • Focus: Practical (e.g. Presentation on how to implement programs and/or practices in the team environment)
    • Target Audience: Leadership (ED, clinical lead, board chair, board member, etc.), Clinical providers, Administrative staff, Representatives of stakeholder/partner organizations

    Learning Objectives

    Learn about the philosophy of care behind the Couchiching Community Health Link, the variables leading to successful system navigation, and the examples of how generative relationships came together to support a patient through a significant challenge affecting their life.

    Summary/Abstract

    This presentation will provide an overview of the philosophy of care employed by the Couchiching Community Health Link, identify the variables leading to the success of clinical system navigation, and, through using the patient’s journey, describe how formative relationships allowed for a significant improvement in their life. This presentation will allow participants to follow a patient through their healthcare journey and hear how clinical system navigation supported them, as well as hear patient feedback and recommendations for the future of health care and Health Links.

    Presenters

    • Sandy Dupuis, Clinical System Navigator, Couchiching Family Health Team
    • Stephanie Kersta, Project Manager, Couchiching Family Health Team
    • Patient Video Appearance

    Authors & Contributors

    • Sandy Dupuis, Clinical System Navigator, Couchiching Community Health Link
    • Stephanie Kersta, Project Manager, Couchiching Community Health Link
  • E6 Changing Governance in Leading Strategic Transformation

    Theme 6. Leadership and governance in a changing environment

     

    Presentation Details

    • Date: 10/18/2016
    • Concurrent Session E
    • Time: 10:45am – 11:30am
    • Room: Harbour B
    • Style: Presentation (information provided to audience, with opportunity for audience to ask question)
    • Focus: Balance between both (e.g. Presentation of a best-practice guideline that combines research evidence, policy issues and practical steps for implementation)
    • Target Audience: Leadership (ED, clinical lead, board chair, board member, etc.), Administrative staff, Representatives of stakeholder/partner organizations

    Learning Objectives

    Participants will learn from the Brighton Quinte West FHT experience of advancing a community governance model built on collaborative leadership to achieve their organizational transformation.   The presentation will outline the process to create a standard approach for accountability and link strategic direction within a policy framework.  The process focused on consistent application of relevant priorities based on the identified organizational deficits and opportunities for corporate standardization.  The approach to link system performance targets and organizational measurement will be beneficial to other organizations in defining a high performing team and incorporating unique community perspectives.

    Summary/Abstract

    The MOHLTC Governance Attestation catalyzed a strategic planning process that aligns performance measurement with fiduciary accountability

    1. The board identified areas of development that aligned with the Provincial transformation and the LHIN Integrated Health Service Plan
    2. A quarterly scorecard based on quality and financial indicators is reported and reviewed to assess performance and facilitate course corrections consistent with the operating and quality plans
    3. The Corporate Bylaws revisions promoted compliance with the recent amendments to legislative requirement and established an annual schedule of corporate policies revision
    4. The evidence based approach promoted a culture of accountability including integration, standardization and collaboration

    Presenters

    • Wendy Parker, Executive Director, Brighton Quinte West Family Health Team
    • Richard Wiginton, MD, CCFP, Board Chair / Lead Physician, Brighton Quinte West Family Health Team

    Authors & Contributors

    • Wendy Parker, RN, BSC, MHA, Executive Director, Brighton Quinte West Family Health Team
    • Richard Wiginton, MD, CCFP, Board Chair and Physician Lead, Brighton Quinte West Family Health Team
    • Bonnie Ainsworth, Program Coordinator, Brighton Quinte West Family Health Team
  • E4 Implementing Patient-Reported Outcome Measures to Evaluate Service: A Falls Programming Case Example

    Theme 4. Measuring performance to foster improvement in comprehensive care

     

    Presentation Details

    • Date: 10/18/2016
    • Concurrent Session E
    • Time: 10:45am – 11:30am
    • Room: Pier 4
    • Style: Workshop (session is structure for interaction and/or hands-on learning opportunities)
    • Focus: Balance between both (e.g. Presentation of a best-practice guideline that combines research evidence, policy issues and practical steps for implementation)
    • Target Audience: Leadership (ED, clinical lead, board chair, board member, etc.), Clinical providers

    Learning Objectives

    1. Discuss the benefits and drawbacks of using patient-reported outcome measures that assess multiple areas of health and function within interprofessional primary care teams
    2. Describe the challenges and strategies for successful implementation of patient-reported outcome measures

    Summary/Abstract

    Using the case example of falls programming, we explored using the Modified Falls Efficacy Scale and Late Life Function and Disability Instrument – Disability Scale to measure patient outcomes. Findings suggest that scale administration time varies by setting, scales require patients’ insight into their abilities, and follow-up assessment can be a challenge. We will discuss lessons learned regarding the usefulness and process of collecting patient-reported outcomes and preliminary findings on the effectiveness of falls programming in interprofessional primary care. This research provides information to support collection of outcomes data in interprofessional primary care teams to inform service improvement and determine effectiveness.

    Presenters

    • Carri Hand, PhD, OT Reg. (ON), Assistant Professor, University of Western Ontario
    • Catherine Donnelly, Queen’s University
    • Maria Borczyk, Aurora-Newmarket FHT
    • Martha Bauer, McMaster FHT
    • Nicole Bobbette, Queen’s FHT – Belleville site

    Authors & Contributors

    • Nanette Bowen-Smith
    • Cecilia Doesborgh
    • Dana Driesman-Klover
    • Gillian Fish
    • Colleen O’Neill
  • E2-b “To Be” or “Not to Be” – “To In-Reach” or “Not to In-Reach” That is the Question

    Theme 2. Optimizing access to interprofessional teams

    Presentation Details

    • Date: 10/18/2016
    • Concurrent Session E
    • Time: 10:45am – 11:30am
    • Room: Harbour A
    • Style: Presentation (information provided to audience, with opportunity for audience to ask question)
    • Focus: Balance between both (e.g. Presentation of a best-practice guideline that combines research evidence, policy issues and practical steps for implementation)
    • Target Audience: Leadership (ED, clinical lead, board chair, board member, etc.), Clinical providers, Administrative staff, Representatives of stakeholder/partner organizations

    Learning Objectives

    1. Gain insight of New Zealand’s approach to providing care closer to home – how to decide what to integrate, how to collaborate, how to utilise specialists effectively to support primary health care to make a real difference to the community you serve
    2. Gain an understanding of how Dr Ross Baker’s 10 key themes underlying high-performing health care systems have made influenced system design to improve health outcomes (The Roles of Leaders in High-Performing Health Care Systems, 2011 Kings Fund)

    Summary/Abstract

    Diabetes specialists working as “in-reach” service in six general practices:

    1. 55% reduction hospital admissions
    2. 53% reduction is average hospital length of stay
    3. MDT outpatient specialist input reduced by 27%

    Nurse Practitioners (NP) working as part of general practice team servicing aged care facilities:

    1. ED visits decreased by 28% post NP intervention compared to a 21% increase for facilities without a NP
    2. Acute hospital admissions were decreased by 22% post NP intervention compared to a 21% increase for facilities without a NP
    3. Avoidable Sensitive Hospital admissions decreased by 26% post NP intervention compared to an 18% increase in facilities without NP

    Presenters

    • Dr Bruce Stewart, GP – Chair Central Primary Health Organisation, Primary Health Care Medical Director – MidCentral District Health Board, Central Primary Health Organisation and MidCentral District Health Board
    • Chiquita Hansen, CEO Central Primary Health Organisation, Director of Nursing MidCentral District Health Board, Central Primary Health Organisation & MidCentral District Health Board
  • E2-a Partnerships with the Community: Using the Medical Home Model to Take Nutrition & Diabetes Education to Patients

    Theme 2. Optimizing access to interprofessional teams

     

    Presentation Details

    • Date: 10/18/2016
    • Concurrent Session E
    • Time: 10:45am – 11:30am
    • Room: Pier 2 & 3
    • Style: Presentation (information provided to audience, with opportunity for audience to ask question)
    • Focus: Practical (e.g. Presentation on how to implement programs and/or practices in the team environment)
    • Target Audience: Leadership (ED, clinical lead, board chair, board member, etc.), Clinical providers, Administrative staff, Representatives of stakeholder/partner organizations

    Learning Objectives

    Creating a virtual medical home represents an opportunity to improve integration and access to care for patients at risk of or living with diabetes when their primary provider is not part of an interdisciplinary FHT.  In this workshop, participants will:

    1. Review the concept of the medical home and the demonstrated benefits of this model
    2. Discuss the process and practical steps to implementing this approach
    3. Assess the feasibility of offering services in this way
    4. Determine capacity and explore how to integrate health professionals from their team into community practices

    Summary/Abstract

    This program is still in the early stages, having begun in December 2015. We have already seen improvement in attendance and therefore anticipate that there will be accompanying improvements in outcomes.     In the session, we will review preliminary results related to:

    1. Access
    2. Integration
    3. Information sharing
    4. Patient satisfaction
    5. Provider satisfaction

    While focused on DEP services, this session will offer participants the opportunity to participate in a discussion of how to best leverage resources to improve access while considering the demands of providing excellent care to rostered patients.

    Presenters

    • Lisa Weinberg, RD, Mount Sinai Academic Family Health Team
    • Deborah Adams, MA, MHSc, CHE Administrative Director, Mount Sinai Academic Family Health Team

    Authors & Contributors

    • Lisa Satira, RD Mount Sinai Family Health Team  lsatira@mtsinai.on.ca
  • E3 Improving Hospital Readmission Rates & Follow-up After Hospitalization: A Team-Based Approach

    Theme 3. Strengthening collaboration within the interprofessional team

     

    Presentation Details

    • Date: 10/18/2016
    • Concurrent Session E
    • Time: 10:45am – 11:30am
    • Room: Metropolitan Ballroom West
    • Style: Presentation (information provided to audience, with opportunity for audience to ask question)
    • Focus: Practical (e.g. Presentation on how to implement programs and/or practices in the team environment)
    • Target Audience: Clinical providers, Representatives of stakeholder/partner organizations

    Learning Objectives

    1. Attendees will understand how they can implement best practices in quality improvement initiatives
    2. Attendees will learn about gaps during transitions of care that highlight needs for further system integration
    3. Attendees will understand how members of the multidisciplinary team can be efficiently involved in the post-hospitalization phase to reduce complications at this stage

    Summary/Abstract

    Data collected from the CVFHT EMR shows an 84% reduction in patient readmissions and a 16% improvement in post-hospitalization follow-up rates using various members of the multidisciplinary team from Jan 2015 to March 2016. The HDP only considers follow-up rates with physicians; in contrast, the CVFHT considered a valid follow-up as one where a contact is made with an MD, NP or RN. This method optimizes the role of various team members, facilitates a sustainable process and supports patient access to primary care. Re-hospitalizations were prevented and home visits were made same day as needed, consistent with patient-centered care.

    Presenters

    • Gordon Canning, Nurse Practitioner, Credit Valley Family Health Team
    • Heather Hadden, Pharmacist, Credit Valley Family Health Team
    • Inge Bonnette, Registered Nurse, Credit Valley Family Health Team
    • Claudia Mazariegos, Registered Dietitian, Credit Valley Family Health Team
    • James Pencharz, MD, Credit Valley Family Health Team

    Authors & Contributors

    • Hilal Syed, Quality Improvement Decision Support Specialist at the Credit Valley Family Health Team
    • James Pencharz, Family Physician, Credit Valley Family Health Team
  • E1 Increasing Diabetic Retinopathy Screening Rates: A Rural Northern Ontario Success Story

    Theme 1. Planning programs and fostering partnerships for healthier communities

     

    Presentation Details

    • Date: 10/18/2016
    • Concurrent Session E
    • Room: Pier 9
    • Time: 10:45am – 11:30am
    • Style: Presentation (information provided to audience, with opportunity for audience to ask question)
    • Focus: Practical (e.g. Presentation on how to implement programs and/or practices in the team environment)
    • Target Audience: Leadership (ED, clinical lead, board chair, board member, etc.), Clinical providers, Administrative staff, Representatives of stakeholder/partner organizations

    Learning Objectives

    1. To identify simple and effective approaches for the successful integration of a mobile diabetic retinal-screening program across health care sectors
    2. To explain how the provision of services within patients’ home communities can increase patient engagement
    3. To describe the utilization of community based collaborative efforts to improve access to screening for patients who have never been screened and for those who have challenges accessing traditional screening models

    Summary/Abstract

    The Teleophthalmology Program (TOP) is a diabetic retinal-screening program offered to under-serviced areas in Ontario. The following outcomes have been documented since the inception of the Teleophthalmology Program on Manitoulin Island:

    1. The highest screening program in Ontario for the fiscal year of 2015-2016
    2. Manitoulin Central FHT increased annual diabetic screening rate from 63.8% to 82.3%, 15% higher than the provincial average
    3. 80% screening rate of Indigenous patients with diabetes on Manitoulin
    4. 8% of patients screened in 2015-2016 had pathologies identified
    5. 27% of the patients participating in 2015-2016 were screened for the first time
    6. 100% screening rates within the communities of Silver Water, Sheshegwaning and Zhiibaahassiing

    As stated by Dr. Mouafak Al Hadi stated, lead physician for the project, “The convenience for the patients has contributed to our success. We have been able to reach never before screened patients by traveling to their local health care centres to provide this service.”

    Presenters

    • Karen Carrick, TOP Coordinator, RPN, Manitoulin Central FHT
    • Ann Cranston, RN, Manitoulin Central FHT
    • Lori Oswald, Executive Director, Manitoulin Central FHT

    Authors & Contributors

    • Karen Carrick, TOP Coordinator, RPN, Manitoulin Central FHT
    • Ann Cranston, RN, Manitoulin Central FHT
    • Lori Oswald, Executive Director, Manitoulin Central FHT
    • Mouafak Al Hadi, Lead Physician for TOP, Manitoulin Central FHT
    • Dr. Frances Kilbertus, Physician, Manitoulin Central FHT
    • Lianne Charette, Health Promoter, RPN, Manitoulin Central FHT