Author: sitesuper

  • “Many moving parts”: update from May 19 PHC Branch meeting

    Discussion at the May 19 quarterly meeting of AFHTO and MOHLTC Primary Health Care Branch covered:

    1. Parameters and next steps for developing new contract templates, given the ministry’s intent to:
      1. Conduct a review of all interprofessional primary care models
      2. Move toward “comprehensive regionally governed, population-based primary health services for Ontarians”
      3. Implement policy directions emerging from sources such as the Expert Panel on Primary Care (Price Report)
    2. Next steps regarding performance reporting and the schedules in the contract
    3. Commitment to improve Schedule A as a tool for meaningful program planning and reporting
    4. Re-purposing funds (e.g. for telemedicine programs)

    1.  Developing new contract templates amidst the “many moving parts”

    AFHTO has been keeping members informed on what is emerging about the province’s policy direction for primary care. (Click here and here for past reports.) The ministry’s desire to move toward a “comprehensive regionally governed, population-based primary health services for Ontarians” is given – implementation questions include how this will affect the organization of primary care, how it is resourced, and what will be the reporting relationships. The review of interprofessional teams can be expected to inform these decisions; however AFHTO anticipates it will be well over a year before there are any results since the details of this review are under development. We understand this review will look at performance and accountability, funding, and use of interprofessional teams (recruitment and retention, ratios of team members, opportunity to leverage these resources). Meanwhile, the current 5-year FHT contracts expire at the end of this fiscal and to that end work to redevelop the contract templates will proceed. Because of these “many moving parts”, the contracts could potentially need further updates going forward. Members may feel unsettled by this uncertainty – understandably so.  Keep in mind the province is well aware that:

    • Quality patient care must continue.
    • Ontario needs AFHTO members – the innovators and leaders in improving comprehensive primary care – in order to succeed in whatever direction the ministry may want to take with primary care.
    • AFHTO members have a very strong voice – through their collective work in this association – and must be engaged in finding the workable solutions for moving forward.

    Next steps:

    • AFHTO has pressed the need for the leaders of our member organizations to receive more information about the direction the province is taking. We have been told the Expert Panel report will be shared, possibly in a few weeks’ time.
    • As reported in the ED Advisory Council news, a work group of AFHTO members will begin the process of reviewing the contract, guided by the principles identified by FHT and NPLC leaders last fall, to identify issues that need to be addressed and begin strategizing.

    2.   Performance reporting and the schedules in the contract

    As reported in the most recent ED Advisory Council news, PHC Branch has agreed to recommendations from AFHTO to:

    • Retain Schedule A – program planning and reporting. (Improvements are required – see the next section below.)
    • Eliminate reporting that is not meaningful, i.e. activity reporting found in Schedule E. (The current contract states Schedule E is required. Contract needs to be changed, but given this direction, AFHTO anticipates compliance is unlikely to be pursued.)
    • In place of Schedule E, leverage work of D2D and to select 6-10 meaningful measures to be included in the next contract agreement.  Ministry priorities would also add:
      • One or two chronic disease measures (AFHTO thinks this is doable in the next iteration of D2D)
      • 7-day follow up (Adopted in the D2D 2.0 list as developmental, since AFHTO Indicators Working Group identified a number of current limitations in this measure that need further refinement)
      • Avoidable ED use (AFHTO Indicators Working Group had concluded this is not a good measure as it is right now. This needs further investigation.)

    3.   Commitment to improve Schedule A as a tool for meaningful program planning and reporting

    All agree that Schedule A has the potential to promote stronger program planning, coordination and evaluation; however many FHT/NPLC EDs have called for improvements to the Schedule A template, instructions and education. Next steps: PHC Branch and AFHTO will put together a joint working group to:

    • Improve Schedule A as a useful tool for program planning and reporting.
    • Do a joint presentation at the AFHTO conference on how to do effective program planning and evaluation, ministry needs for reporting, and how to use Schedule A effectively.

    4.   Re-purposing funds

    AFHTO followed up on a question from our previous meeting with PHC Branch regarding funding to replace telemedicine equipment. The response was that, for everyone who had asked, the ministry was able to help the FHT/NPLC identify existing funds to re-purpose to purchase replacement equipment. PHC Branch reps said this was also true for those who asked to re-purpose funds to cover sessional costs for these telemedicine consults. We were told that, for the past fiscal year, there are still some FHTs and NPLCs returning unspent funds to the Province. Next steps:

    • As reported from the Nov. 21 AFHTO-PHC Branch meeting, FHTs and NPLCs are encouraged to request reallocation of approved budgets to meet needs.
    • When it comes to telemedicine programs, AFHTO has reminded PHC Branch of the need to address the policy question as to how this need can be supported in a sustainable fashion.

    Participants in the May 19, 2015 meeting AFHTO was represented by:

    • Randy Belair (AFHTO President and ED, Sunset Country FHT, Kenora)
    • Sean Blaine (AFHTO Vice President and Lead MD, STAR FHT, Stratford)
    • Ross Kirkconnell (Secretary + QIDS Steering Committee Chair and ED, Guelph FHT)
    • Kavita Mehta (ED Advisory Council Chair and ED, South East Toronto FHT)
    • Angie Heydon (AFHTO Executive Director)

    MOHLTC’s PHC Branch representatives were:

    • Nadia Surani (Senior Manager, Interprofessional Programs Unit, PHC Branch)
    • Fernando Tavares (Program Manager, Interprofessional Programs)
    • Debbie Lora (Senior Program Consultant)
  • AFHTO 2015 Conference: Thank you to everyone who submitted an abstract!

    Over 170 submissions were received for concurrent session and poster presentations at the AFHTO 2015 Conference. Thank you to all those who applied!

    A confirmation e-mail has been sent to the contact person for each abstract submission. If you are part of a group that has prepared an abstract, please ensure your group contact has received the e-mail with the subject: “AFHTO 2015 Conference: thank you for submitting your abstract”.

    If your contact person has NOT received this confirmation, please contact info@afhto.ca by Friday, May 22, 2015 at 1:00 PM (EST). The confirmation e-mail is your assurance that your abstract has been received and will be reviewed by a working group for presentation at the conference.

    Final concurrent session and poster presentations will be selected by June 8, 2015. The program will be announced when registration opens in late June 2015.

    We look forward to seeing you at the AFHTO 2015 Conference! Team-Based Primary Care: The Foundation of a Sustainable Health System October 28 & 29, 2015 Westin Harbour Castle, One Harbour Square, Toronto

  • Data to Decisions (D2D) 2.0: Data submission form now available – submit all data by May 28

    Start inputting data through the D2D Submission Form today! All data for D2D is to be submitted by May 28, 2015.

    Enter your team’s data through the D2D Submission Form using your team’s unique code:

    • If you’ve already created your team code, you are ready to submit data through the D2D Submission Form. Input your Team Code and start submitting data.
    • If you have not yet created your team code, input the code you would like to use and the form will prompt you to register it. From there you can start submitting your team’s data.

    Resources for Contributing Data:

    Why participate in D2D? Click here for a video to help EDs, physicians, Boards and QIDSS start discussing D2D and how your team can participate.  D2D 2.0 is a membership-wide summary of performance on a small number of indicators that are both possible for members to measure and meaningful to them.

  • Review D2D 2.0

    WHY: To compare progress to peers, using your team’s code (entered during the data submission process). WHAT: Teams not contributing data can still view aggregate results on D2D and compare to their own local sources of team data (e.g. QIP, annual report etc.).

    • Review final D2D 2.0 report via Members-only page of AFHTO web site.

    WHEN: Mid-June 2015

  • Complete data submission

    WHY: Ensure all data are submitted according to the guidelines presented herein to allow for comparison between teams WHAT:

    • Enter data into the data submission form for all the indicators your team has selected.
    • See instructions for using the data submission tool, ask a QIDSS or, if you don’t have access to a QIDSS, contact Carol Mulder for help.

    WHEN: May 28, 2015

  • Preview team-level data prior to contribution to D2D 2.0

    WHY: To ensure entire team is aware of team-level performance and will not be “surprised” at the release of D2D 2.0. WHAT:

    • Preview D2D 2.0 data with practice decision-makers (e.g. physicians, staff, Board, etc.).
    • Decide which data to contribute to D2D 2.0.
    • Consider showing the D2D video to inform this conversation.

    WHEN: May 19 – May 28, 2015

  • Request data from ICES (OHIP billing data)

    WHY: To ensure you get team-level data from ICES to review and contribute to D2D 2.0, if you choose to do so. WHAT:

    • Consult with physicians to ensure all are on board to submit team data to D2D. Consider showing the D2D video to inform this conversation.
    • The deadline for requesting your OHIP billing data from ICES via AFHTO has passed. You can still access a portion of the indicators for D2D 2.0 from the HQO Primary Care Practice Report (in collaboration with team physicians) or contact Carol Mulder for other options.
    • If you requested your OHIP billing data from ICES via AFHTO you will receive your data on May 19, 2015. They are being sent ONLY to the people indicated on the data request form, which for most teams is the ED and/or Medical Lead.  The data were received from ICES and parsed into team-specific files by Carol Mulder of AFHTO (as per request).  As per confidentiality agreement, identified-team-specific data was, is not, and will not be available to anyone else. Teams with more than one physician group will receive FHO and FHN specific rates once all team-level data are distributed, in respect of the D2D 2.0 data submission deadline.
    • The ICES data file is laid out for use by someone comfortable with using Excel at a moderately technical level.  The layout is not conducive to presentation or collaborative decision-making with non-technical staff.  For example, the rates are presented with far more decimal places than is necessary, an artifact of the analysis process.  D2D 2.0 is intended to be the more user-friendly vehicle to view of the data.
    • The indicators are sorted in the order they appear on the data submission form.  There is one indicator (Review of patients in registries: diabetes registry) which can be entered in the EMR section of the Expanded data submission, even though it comes from ICES rather than EMR data.  There are also a few additional indicators not needed for D2D 2.0 (eg adjusted and unadjusted rates for some indicators).  This for information only and not for D2D 2.0 submission.  See D2D Data Dictionary for more details on the data.  Please refresh cookies to get the most recent version if you have accessed it before.
    • The ICES data are presented as rates (no numerator or denominator data).  They are also based on Rostered and Virtually rostered clients, and are therefore more appropriately considered as rates for all patients, not just rostered patients.
    • Your team’s rates are presented in the column headed “V##” where ## is a meaningless number generated by ICES to ensure anonymity through the data processing and management process.
    • Set data aside for submission to D2D 2.0 (see data submission guide).

    WHEN: ASAP

  • Sign up for D2D 2.0

    WHY: To ensure your team has direct support throughout the process WHAT:

    • Complete and submit form to indicate intent to contribute data (not binding).
    • Consider showing the D2D video to help EDs, physicians, Boards and QIDSS start discussing D2D and how your team can participate.

    WHEN: no later than May 19, 2015

  • Exploratory indicator: 7-day follow-up after hospitalization

    WHY: To prepare your team to tell your “follow-up” story about how 7-day follow-up after hospitalization data is collected and tracked. These stories will help develop consensus on a more manageable, meaningful way to do and track follow-up after hospitalization. These locally derived follow-up rates will not be comparable between teams. They will be used to inform consensus-building only to improve the indicator for the future. WHAT: If your team is not formally tracking follow-up rates, you will not be able to contribute data for this indicator.

    • Find out if your team is tracking “follow-up after hospitalization” in a formal way.
    • Get data for your locally-derived follow-up rates for the most recent time period, whatever that may be for your team.
    • Get details on the story of exactly how follow-up is done and what data are captured by whom to generate the follow-up rate.
    • Get data on the follow-up rate from MOHLTC Health Data Branch (HDB) report (for comparison to locally derived rates).
    • Set your locally derived rate, your MOHLTC rate and your story aside for submission to D2D 2.0 (see data submission guide).

    WHEN: Before May 28, 2015

  • Assemble team descriptive data

    WHY: To prepare your team to contribute data that will help you and others do a peer comparison with other teams. WHAT:

    • See D2D Data Dictionary for details on team description data e.g. rural, teaching status etc.
    • Consult with team to decide how best to describe your team.
    • Set data aside for submission to D2D 2.0 (see data submission guide).

    WHEN: Before May 28, 2015